Since 1974 a creative and efficient global niche player in the field of medical publishing

The Case of Frederick the Noble

edited by: W. Pirsig & R.J. Ruben

Price: € 20.00 / US $ 24.00

Add to cart Google Play

Publication details: Book. 2020. vii and 68 pages. Publication date: 2020-08-12. Softbound. A5

ISBN: 978-90-6299-285-0 (ISBN 10: 90-6299-285-4; Kugler Publications)

Also available as ebook



During the study of the history of the disease of Frederick, Crown Prince and later German Emperor Frederick III (October 18, 1831–June 15, 1888) in the library of the Otto-von-Bismarck-Stiftung in Friedrichsruh, Germany in 2010, an unpublished series of twelve letters was found concerning the care of the Crown Prince. They were written by Felix Semon (December 18, 1849–March 1, 1929) and sent to Nikolaus Heinrich Ferdinand Herbert, Count of Bismarck (December 28, 1849–September 18, 1904), State Secretary of the Foreign Office and the son of Otto Eduard Leopold, Prince of Bismarck, Duke of Lauenburg (April 1, 1815–July 30, 1898), Minister President of Prussia. These letters were written in Sütterlin, the current German handwriting script and can be studied as microfilms (fiche). These letters expressed Semon’s concern about the care that was provided by Sir Morell Mackenzie ( July 7, 1837–February 3, 1892) to Frederick.

Semon was born in Danzig, to an upper middle-class family and was a schoolmate of Herbert von Bismarck. Semon received his medical degree in Berlin, emigrated to the United Kingdom and became a pupil of Mackenzie, then a prominent laryngologist in London. He published two books in1880 and in 1884 he published the German translation of Mackenzie’s classic text. Semon was an early developer of neurolaryngology. He founded and edited the Internationales Centralblatt für Laryngologie, Rhinologie und verwandte Wissenschaften.

Sir Morell Mackenzie was from Leytonstone, Essex, England. He became one of the world’s most influential laryngologists. In 1863, Mackenzie founded the first Hospital for Diseases of the Throat in King Street, Golden Square. He produced numerous books which were translated into many languages. These included The Use of the Laryngoscope in Diseases of the Throat (1865); Growths in the Larynx (1871) A manual of diseases of the throat and nose, including the pharynx, larynx, trachea, oesophagus, nasal cavities, and neck (German translation published in 1880;8 18843). His The Hygiene of the Vocal Organs: A Practical Handbook for Singers and Speakers (1886) was republished well into the 20th century.

At the time of writing these letters, Nikolaus Heinrich Ferdinand Herbert, Count of Bismarck, the elder son of Otto Eduard Leopold, Prince of Bismarck, Duke of Lauenburg, Minister President of Prussia, was the State Secretary of the Foreign Office. He was on friendly terms with Semon and was addressed by his first name Herbert. They first met at Semon’s father’s house while they were students. There was a later university encounter during student dueling, when they both dueled with different opponents and were wounded. In 1882, Herbert was in London as attaché of the German Embassy and renewed his friendship with Semon. This was the basis for the writing of the twelve letters during 1887 and 1888. Semon quotes from a letter from Herbert dated the 7th of September 1888, in which it appears he was transmitting Semon’s critique of Mackenzie to the Prince of Wales:

“I have had a conversation with the Prince of Wales about him. I told the Prince that the Emperor might have lived several years longer if he had never seen Mackenzie. I gather that H.R.H. did not like to hear this, the less as he had no reply to the arguments I based on the medical aspects of the case.”

Each of the letters was transposed from Sütterlin script into a typescript. They were then translated into English by the authors. Each letter is presented in translation. A description of the events preceding each letter is given. The references are to publications, mainly newspaper articles. The footnotes are explanations of terms and places, and of the individuals mentioned in these letters.

Table of Contents



The letters
Letter #1 – July 31, 1887
Letter #2 – August 6, 1887
Letter #3 – September 8, 1887
Letter #4 – November 14, 1887
Letter #5 – November 19, 1887
Letter #6 – December 20, 1887
Letter #7 – January 21, 1888
Letter #8 – February 21, 1888
Letter #9 – March 7, 1888
Letter #10 – July 9, 1888
Letter #11 – July 11, 1888
Letter #12 – July 12, 1888




European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Diseases -
By Prof. Albert Mudry

New information about the disease of German Emperor Frederick the Noble

The disease and death of German Emperor Karl Frederick III (1831-1888) has often been described in historical and medical treatises. These were all based on official political and medical reports published during 1887-1888 [1]. On 15 June 1888, the Emperor, died of laryngeal cancer at the New Palace in Potsdam. He was 57 years old and had reigned for only 99 days. While still Crown Prince, he had been treated for a laryngeal disease by Morel Mackenzie (1837-1892), Britain's leading laryngologist, who maintained for a long time, contrary to the opinion of German laryngologists, notably Felix Semon (1849-1921), that the disease was a benign wart and not a cancer [2]. In studying and presenting 12 original never published letters (collected in the Bismarck-Stifftung in Friedrichruh/Germany) written in German by Semon between July 31, 1887 to July 12, 1888, and sent to Nikolaus Heinrich Herbert (1849-1904), Count von Bismarck, State Secretory of the Foreign Office, Wolfgang Pirsig and Robert J. Ruben, bring, in a small book, some new documents dealing with “The case of Frederick the Noble” [3]. These 12 letters are fully translated into English and precisely replaced in their context, and in contrast with the official reports, some of them being written by Mackenzie. They give new insights of the rivalry and opposition between Semon and Mackenzie around the sad story of the Emperor. To give the readers the stimulus to read this book and to enter again in this story, some extracts are reprinted here. On April 18, 1887, the clinical diagnosis of cancer was made. A thyrotomy [4-5] was proposed but postponed by Mackenzie who regularly made biopsies sent to Rudolf Virchow (1821-1902) for pathological examination, never returning with the confirmation of a cancer but of a “pachydermia verrucosa laryngis.” [6] On July 31, 1887, Semon wrote his first letter: “the British Medical Journal, obviously based upon information from Mackenzie, reported concerning the state of the larynx after the operation [ie, biopsy] and noted, in most optimistic manner, an improvement in the voice. Briefly, everything is rosy!” September 8, “If it is benign, then it is unclear why the Prince should be hoarse permanently […] If the disease is malignant, one would expect that the experienced laryngologists who have observed the case for a longer time, would recognize this and have now made a more definite diagnosis.” November 6, Mackenzie, after making a laryngoscopy, answered to the Crown Prince’s question ‘is it a cancer’: “I am sorry to say, sir, that it looks very much like it but it is impossible to be certain.” November 14, Semon wrote: “How terribly sad that all my predictions and fears came true […] Unfortunately, the doctors now agree that it is a cancer, and this is now so definite that it has been publicly expressed […] The only possible chance of cure of our suffering Crown Prince is a total laryngectomy.” On December 17, Mackenzie published a paragraph concerning his role in agreeing with all the consultants that this was a cancer. He is defending himself because the German press had felt that he was at fault for not making the diagnosis. Mackenzie included several sentences concerning Virchow’s negative pathology report which supported his earlier conclusions about the case. January 21, 1888, Semon wrote: “Our poor suffering Crown Prince appears to be gradually worsening in spite of favorable newspaper announcements.” Mackenzie informed on January 31, 1888 that a tracheotomy might have to be performed, but remained still intellectually unwilling to make the diagnosis of cancer. He wrote: “At this moment medical science does not permit me to affirm that any other disease is present than chronic interstitial inflammation of the larynx combined with perichondritis.” After the tracheotomy performed on February 9, 1888, Semon wrote February 21, “I have instinctive feeling that the situation is infinitely sad and it becomes even sadder for me. For the knowledge of all the opportunities that have been missed and now are lost […] I did not at all like the occurrence of bleeding on Title / Authors / Affiliations Click here to view linked References the 5th and 6th day after the tracheotomy […] I have, from the beginning, considered it likely that the bleeding originates from the cancer itself!”. Two weeks later, Semon added, “With open eyes, consciously, one has let the disease progress more and more and thereby determine this disease, until all reasonable hope of success is ruled out completely, and now one is thinking to offer this operation? […] The conceit of the person who was to blame for everything, now had the nerve to state on the one hand that this terrible total laryngectomy is ‘less dangerous’ now than in May of last year […] Are we all in Bedlam? What I have just written to you in my feeling of emotions of deeply patriotic and scientific wrath, my dear count, of all German physicians, from by far the greatest part of the educated correct thinking Germans, of the righteously thinking, scientific English physicians, surgeons, and probably from a small part of the educated British lay public […] As I told you yesterday, it seems to me that ‘noble silence’ has its limits!” Finally, after the death of Emperor Frederick III, Semon wrote: “I am only surprised that no Englishman has yet had the courage to say publicly what we hear often enough in private: that the entire matter is sickening! […] I am curious as to what will be the end of the story.” On his side, Mackenzie published a book! [5] But is this story really ended?


1.sMac Kenzie M, Schweig H. Case of Emperor Fredrerick III. Full official reports. New York: Werner, 1888.

2. Laccourreye O, Werner A, Laccourreye H, Bonfils P. Tobacco and otorhinolaryngology: epic and disaster. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2014;131:183-188.

3. Pirsig W, Ruben RJ. The Case of Frederick the Noble. Amsterdam: Kugler, 2020.

4. Rudert H, Werner JA. The laryngeal disease of the German Emperor Friedrich III: treatment failure or fateful course. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:1489-1506.

5. Laccourreye O, Garcia D, Maldent JB, Werner A. Une illustration du progrès, des difficultés et des conflits en médecine : l’histoire des laryngectomies. Bull Acad Natl Med 2011;195:741- 753.

6. Cardesa A, Zidar N, Alos L, Nadal A, Gale N, Klöppel G. The Kaiser’s cancer revisited: was Virchow totally wrong? Virchows Arch 2011;458:649-657.

7. Mackenzie M. The fatal illness of Frederick the Noble. London: Sampson Low & Co. 1888.

HNO Informationen 1/2021
By Dr. med. W. Lübbers

The Case of Frederick the Noble Felix Semon´s letters to Nikolaus Heinrich Herbert Count von Bismarck, State Secretary of the Foreign Office

The medical history of Crown Prince Friedrich von Prussia does not only describe the tragic course a laryngeal carcinoma not recognized in time, it is also an example of envious hostility among colleagues, among teachers and students and among world-famous laryngologists.

The authors of this book call themselves humble as editor of12 letters from the German - but living in London - Laryngologist Felix Semon (1849–1929) to the State Secretary of the interior and Attaché of the Germans Embassy in London, Heinrich Herbert Count von Bismarck (1849-1904), son of the Reich Chancellor Otto by Bismarck. Letter writer and letter recipient were school friends. The writers are also available as Authors of the great historical knowledge embossed, inserted in the book Background explanations tried hard the confused "sources" - Situation from instrumentalizing Interpretations and "fake news" to unravel.

The whole Medical history of Prussian Crown Prince is characterized by misjudgments, intrigues, accusations and unworthy disputes between those treating German and English doctors who are also still members of both royal houses and especially the German Reich government under Otto von Bismarck and the wife of the terminally ill patient interfered.

These already difficult to endure conditions were caught by daily taunts in the English German press still aggravated. Explained in his letters Semon as a specialist (Laryngologist!) His Friend Heinrich von Bismarck the suffering of Crown Prince from his View. Semon comments only those accessible to him Press releases d the often "pierced" News too the findings and the Disease state of Crown Prince. He had in his comments great "political" freedom, since he himself is not in the treatment of the Patients involved was. The addressee of the Letters must be delighted about the information from this scientifically prominently located Been a source be, it was from a German friend and thus on the part of Prussian government. Semon warns about Heinrich like this von Bismarck, who made this information safe Father, who passed on to Reich Chancellor Otto von Bismarck, the Prussian government before treating the German Crown Prince and designated Emperor of the German Reiches before what he believed to be flawed Treatment of the Englishman Morell Mackenzie. So disavowed Semon his former friend and teacher im Subject of laryngology.

In addition to showing the course of the disease, open these letters reveal a previously unknown aspect of the relationship of the two leading world-famous laryngologists at the time Mackenzie and Semon among themselves:

This is the case with some quotations from Semon's letters to Heinrich von Bismarck prove: .... But I also repeat that “the management of the whole affair “in harmony with the traditions Mackenzie’s is there and cannot be cheap! (Quote from letter 2) .... In this case, it seems to me - entre nous - M.’s approach than pure tailoring! (Quote from letter 2) .... and the only explanation that seems to come up is the one that Sir Morell Mackenzie has a taste for Has found "travel fees"! (Quote from letter 3) ... Given my previous relationships with Mackenzie there is nothing easier than suspecting my motives, and even if I don't face an open conflict with him shrink back, I wish to avoid such a thing the. But I am sure that you will give the count discretion have recommended. (Quote from letter 5) ....... I myself consider myself obliged to provide you with to report: It has generally - here too – strange det that Prof. B. Fränkel passed over and instead of his Dr. Krause has been elected. Krause is undoubtedly a good man ger, ambitious and scientific doctor, but belonged so far, as far as the public opinion of the experts goes, not to the first authorities, under which Frankel is to be expected safely. Also, he never heard of throat cancer written. The reason of the hit by Mr. Mackenzie Choice is based - in my best conviction - in the fact that Frankel, as he well knows, is an intimate friend from me, while I am with Krause, who by the way, I appreciate had a sharp, scientific controversy have! As you know, Mr. Mackenzie honors me with his most intense hatred. And for this reason – because no other is conceivable - he pulls a younger laryngolo gen before, which he no doubt also for a personal one Opponent of mine stopped, and harmed a deserving man in his scientific and civil position! It is just in harmony with everything else! (Quote from letter 5)

You couldn't say it any clearer! Unfortunately the corresponding letters are from Heinrich von Bismarck during a German bombing raid in World War II burned in London. Semon cites only one fragment from a reply from 09/07/1888 that Heinrich von Bismarck Semon`s criticism of Mackenzie the Prince of Wales submitted:

“I had a conversation with the Prince of Wales (Prince Albert Edward, from 1901 King Edward VII) about him. I told the prince that the emperor (Friedrich III) some Would have lived more years if he hadn't ever been Mackenzie would have seen. I suspect the H.R.M. (Her Royal Majesty) will not like to hear this, all the less than that he no answer to the arguments i had on that medical aspects of the case. "(end of quote) The authors have now succeeded through the commenting Publication of twelve in science not yet published letters from Felix Semon to his school friend Heinrich von Bismarck added an important piece of the mosaic to the confused intrigues of the royal family, doctors and press to insert. In addition, the letters, some of which were in facsimile can be reproduced from today only with difficulty Sütterlin script to be deciphered was transcribed into Latin script to be translated into English. The authors have the historical one for each of the letters Context presented so that the contents of the letters can be effortlessly translated into the course of the disease can be classified. The content but the letter also shows the complete - human as well as scientific - Rift among the leading laryngologists at the time Semon and Mackenzie up. Everyone involved at the time was unpredictable that failure to recognize the larynx ca at the German heir to the throne and later Emperor Friedrich III significant influence in the opinion of later commentators on the German (Prussian) - British relationship. But this topic has also been controversial for generations discussed.

An exciting book that is well worth reading, not just for him history-interested ENT doctor! An issue on German would be desirable.

Kugler Publications
Postal address:
P.O. Box 20538
1001 NM Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 68 45 700